Skip to content
humaineeti

AI Engineering · Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Retrieval, engineered.

A model only knows what it has seen. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) teaches it the rest of your business — in real time, on the right data, with the right governance. We engineer retrieval systems that survive production: indexed against ground truth, evaluated continuously, and accountable for every answer and the source behind it.

Why it matters

RAG is a discipline, not a feature.

Most RAG demos work on a hundred documents and break on a hundred thousand. Our work begins where the demo ends.

  1. 01Chunking discipline — how content is split decides what can ever be retrieved
  2. 02Hybrid retrieval — the right answer is rarely in one channel
  3. 03Citation fidelity and freshness windows — answers accountable to their source and the moment it came from
  4. 04An evaluation harness that catches drift before your users do

What we engineer

Retrieval patterns that hold at scale.

Hybrid retrieval

Vector, keyword and structured retrieval, scored together. The right answer is rarely in one channel.

Agentic RAG

The agent decides what to retrieve, when, and how to use it — with multi-hop retrieval, query rewriting and self-critique built in.

GraphRAG

For domains where relationships matter more than text, with knowledge graphs as first-class context.

Citation-grounded answers

Every claim traceable to a source document, paragraph and timestamp. An audit trail by design.

RAG evaluation

Faithfulness, answer relevance, context precision and context recall — scored on every change.

The stack we use

Model-agnostic. Deployment-flexible.

We build on what you already pay for, or on what best fits your constraints.

Vector stores

  • Pinecone
  • Milvus
  • Weaviate
  • Qdrant
  • pgvector
  • OpenSearch

Hybrid search and reranking

  • BM25 + dense
  • Cohere reranker
  • BGE-reranker

Knowledge graphs

  • Neo4j
  • Neptune
  • Memgraph

Frontier models

  • Claude
  • GPT
  • Gemini

Open-weight models

  • Qwen
  • Kimi
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama

Embeddings

  • OpenAI
  • Cohere
  • BGE
  • NV-Embed
  • Custom domain-tuned

Orchestration

  • LangChain
  • LlamaIndex
  • Custom orchestrators
  • MCP-native tool integration
  • Caching, streaming and fallbacks

Evaluation

  • Ragas
  • Custom scorer frameworks
  • LLM-as-a-Judge
  • Continuous evaluation tied to deployment

The question we hear most

RAG or fine-tuning: when to use each.

Most enterprise systems need both.

  • The knowledge changes

    Use fine-tuning when…
    The response style needs to change
  • Sources need to be cited

    Use fine-tuning when…
    The response format needs to change
  • Answers must be grounded in your data

    Use fine-tuning when…
Read the full decision guide: RAG vs Fine-Tuning

Where it fits

The engineering discipline behind most of what we ship.

RAG powers conversational analytics, knowledge assistants, customer-support agents, code search, compliance review and internal copilots that must answer with citations. It drives semantic-layer-aware retrieval in AI-Powered BI, grounds every action our Future of Work co-workers take, ships through the GenAI Delivery Factory, and is scored by Agent Evaluations — retrieval and generation, separately and together.

Next step

We are an intent away.

Bring the corpus your demo broke on. We’ll show you how hybrid retrieval, citation-grounded answers and continuous evaluation hold up on your data.